<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy: Twitter Traitor</title>
	<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/</link>
	<description>Fancytime Adventure Bloggings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: lake</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-6772</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-6772</guid>
					<description>ditto previous post i left.
can i grovel?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ditto previous post i left.<br />
can i grovel?!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pro Information Center &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Changing Face of Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-6051</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-6051</guid>
					<description>[...] I think the best way to understand how Facebook has gone beyond being just a social networking site is to see how it has evolved from what we meant by social networking site in 2004. Facebook&#8217;s three big axes of change can be summarized in terms of access, audience and information the first two of which are closely intertwined. The first Facebook, which was actually officially called thefacebook at the time (pictured courtesy archive.org) was essentially just your profile and a list of your friends, like all good social networks of the time (and still some today). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I think the best way to understand how Facebook has gone beyond being just a social networking site is to see how it has evolved from what we meant by social networking site in 2004. Facebook&#8217;s three big axes of change can be summarized in terms of access, audience and information the first two of which are closely intertwined. The first Facebook, which was actually officially called thefacebook at the time (pictured courtesy archive.org) was essentially just your profile and a list of your friends, like all good social networks of the time (and still some today). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tehninjo0</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5865</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5865</guid>
					<description>the thing is though, that you are just as cruel as Jeremy.. only 52 times over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing is though, that you are just as cruel as Jeremy.. only 52 times over.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adam from work</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5559</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5559</guid>
					<description>I recall a paper-based predecessor to twitter from my time in primary school. We actually carried around pieces of paper upon which we listed our best friends. 

I'm still surprised at a child's capacity for political intrigue; we became quite sophisticated at discerning which lists we were on (the lists were not public domain, so we had to use a combination of manipulation and diplomacy); and on a surface level we understood the ramifications of adding - or choosing not to add - candidates to our own lists. It's also surprising how much we cared about the whole tawdry business.

I think it's an understandable phenomenon if you consider our instinctive in-group/out-group mentality. Our primal brains seem to be strongly wired towards processing filial and tribal relationships. It's why we have team sports, "Who" magazine, twitter and War.

So, Dave, can I be your friend? I have an Xbox ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall a paper-based predecessor to twitter from my time in primary school. We actually carried around pieces of paper upon which we listed our best friends. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still surprised at a child&#8217;s capacity for political intrigue; we became quite sophisticated at discerning which lists we were on (the lists were not public domain, so we had to use a combination of manipulation and diplomacy); and on a surface level we understood the ramifications of adding - or choosing not to add - candidates to our own lists. It&#8217;s also surprising how much we cared about the whole tawdry business.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an understandable phenomenon if you consider our instinctive in-group/out-group mentality. Our primal brains seem to be strongly wired towards processing filial and tribal relationships. It&#8217;s why we have team sports, &#8220;Who&#8221; magazine, twitter and War.</p>
<p>So, Dave, can I be your friend? I have an Xbox &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Changing Faces of Facebook &#124; kay.four.tee.three // kate raynes-goldie</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5529</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5529</guid>
					<description>[...] I think the best way to understand how Facebook has gone beyond being just a social networking site is to see how it has evolved from what we meant by social networking site in 2004. Facebook&#8217;s three big axes of change can be summarized in terms of access, audience and information the first two of which are closely intertwined. The first Facebook, which was actually officially called thefacebook at the time (pictured courtesy archive.org) was essentially just your profile and a list of your friends, like all good social networks of the time (and still some today). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I think the best way to understand how Facebook has gone beyond being just a social networking site is to see how it has evolved from what we meant by social networking site in 2004. Facebook&#8217;s three big axes of change can be summarized in terms of access, audience and information the first two of which are closely intertwined. The first Facebook, which was actually officially called thefacebook at the time (pictured courtesy archive.org) was essentially just your profile and a list of your friends, like all good social networks of the time (and still some today). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5521</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5521</guid>
					<description>I will never understand the appeal of twitter.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never understand the appeal of twitter&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5517</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mobilefono.com/2008/09/22/jeremy-twitter-traitor/#comment-5517</guid>
					<description>I feel your pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
