Kit Kat Doom

(x-posted from Tuna Cupcake)

When Kate asked me if I wanted to a review a new Kit Kat flavour, I was initially suspicious. I know that Kate is quite fond of her esoteric Kit Kats, particularly when they’re in limited supply. Plus, having followed her long, tortuous journey through the warped world of Nestle’s imagination, I’ve long been suspicious of an eventual decline into the “regrettable” range of flavours: Decaying Flesh, Childhood Trauma, Poison. Fortunately, it just turns out we’re dealing with Cookie Dough here.

Unfortunately, things went a little awry before I had a chance to dig in. You see, the “first” half of the bar was purloined by Kate before I could sink my teeth into it. You know the half I’m talking about: the half with the initial bite, the bite that is pure chocolate. The bite that cleanses the palette, sets the chocolaty baseline in advance of the complex flavours to follow. Without this half, a meaningful reading of the complete experience is difficult to fathom. For all I know, half of the Cookie Dough chocolate bar could be covered in moss, or filled with rotten teeth. Maybe that sort of thing is big in Asia. You’ll have to ask Kate. In the meantime, all I can do is my best.

My initial impressions went something like this: There’s not much going on here. This is certainly one of the more conservative Kit Kat offerings; it’s quite a ways from the explicit, unabashed flavour of Mint or Strawberry. That doesn’t make it bad, mind you. When you think about it, Cookie Dough flavour is perhaps the logical zenith of the core Kit Kat trajectory; the Kit Kat, after all, is largely a cookie. So if you add more cookie-ness, are you really doing something new? Or are you just lifting the traditional offering to a new level? As a fan of the fundamental Kit Kat prototype, I’m not against this way of doing things. I’m enjoying this Cookie Dough Kit Kat — it feels like coming home to an old friend, who has just purchased a slightly larger house with a pool. It’s nice to hang out with my friend, but it’s even better when we have a pool.

However, upon passing the first draft of this review to my editor (Kate), she stormed over to my desk and demanded to know what kind of hack food journalist considers caramel and cookie dough uninteresting. I informed that all Kit Kats had caramel, and she reminded me that I’m used to eating Kit Kat Caramels. It turns out she was right; and this is an important distinction. The Kit Kat Caramel represents a significant improvement over the basic Kit Kat model — in fact, may represent a local peak in candy bar evolution. To say that the Cookie Dough Kit Kat, then, is a minor improvement on the Caramel, is to say that it is a minor improvement on near-perfection.

There is, of course, the creaminess to speak of. The “cookie dough” in question here isn’t so much dough, as a dubious paste. To some, this may be off-putting. However, if you’re any sort of Kit Kat aficionado, you’re probably used to these sorts of shenanigans. The idea isn’t to focus on the individual textures, but on the gestalt; and the creaminess is, for the most part, lost in the familiar crunch of wafer and chocolate. You can tell it’s there, but it doesn’t interfere. It’s nice, but not *too* nice, like a creepy uncle.

As you can probably tell, I would recommend this chocolate bar. It’s nothing revolutionary. But if you want something revolutionary, why are you eating a Kit Kat? Kit Kats are about minor but solid variations on a consistent, underlying theme. In this respect, the Cookie Dough Kit Kat succeeds marvelously. I give it 8.5 Kits out of a possible Kat.

1 Comment »

Who is EDGAR?

EDGAR created his first webpage at the age of 2, and sold it to CNET for five million dollars at the age of 4. At the age of 6, he invented Bittorrent. At the age of 7, he shared a beer with Larry Page and Sergey Brin. However, he is over 100 years old.

EDGAR was the first person to discover the Bonus Stage in Wikipedia.

EDGAR is the actual creator of every single Youtube video with more than one million views.

EDGAR has been to the year 2079. While there, he had a postcerebral actuator chip installed into his hippocampus, and downloaded the entire contents of human knowledge and history into his brain. Currently, he contains more information than the universe itself.

EDGAR owns 68% of the world’s supply of pixels.

EDGAR, Tim O’Reilly, Kevin Rose, Caterina Fake and Robert Scoble are actually the same person.

EDGAR has had his body modified through highly experimental surgery. In addition into the normal gastrointestinal system, he has ‘installed’ a secondary system capable of transforming complex data into nutritional material ready for digestion. This modification allows him to consume information at an extraordinary rate, and process it constantly.

EDGAR is formulating a plan. The world will learn more at Edge of the Web. Those who prove themselves resourceful now will be rewarded with greater opportunities within the New Web Order.

No Comments »

Google Slow

First, a little bit of review. Many of you are probably familiar with the Google “20% policy,” whereby employees are allowed to use 20% of their working time to develop side projects. This policy has led to the development of many earth shatteringly innovative products, like Google Moderator.

While I was working at Google, my side project was something I like to call “Google Slow.” It’s like normal Google, but slower. Incredibly, heartrendingly slower. Basically, instead of typing your search query into a text box and clicking a button, you type it into a piece of paper and click on a mailbox. I receive the letter, and compile a list of results for you. As a bonus, I include handy tips and editorial content. Then, in 4-6 weeks you receive your list of relevant websites. My ideas was that this service would be useful to those who don’t have access to a computer, as well as those who prefer a more relaxed pace to life. This would also alleviate the problem of aimless web surfing. If your search engine takes a month to get back to you, there’s no risk of accidentally spending an entire evening drunkenly trying to find a video of fish doing it.

When I presented this idea to my manager, we shared a somewhat awkward moment. He stared at me from behind his desk, his expression one of startled embarrassment, like I had stumbled across some sort of terrible secret. But he didn’t say anything. We remained silent for perhaps a minute; I started to realize I was holding my breath. I think he was holding his breath too, because his face began to turn blue. Luckily, my phone started buzzing, so I exhaled deeply, and mumbled, I, uh, I need to take that, I guess. Slowly, I backed out of the room. One week later I received a gift basket filled with gourmet cheeses from Larry Page, and a note that said, “Keep up the gouda work!” However, the Google Slow project didn’t get picked up.

On the plus side, this has left me to develop the concept as a business of my own. I’ve stuck with the Google Slow moniker, since it describes the idea pretty well, and I haven’t received a C & D yet. Still, I’m on the lookout for a new name. In the meantime, the service has been turning in a healthy bit of profit. I figure it’s important to keep the meme going strong, so I thought I’d publicly display a bit of the traffic I’ve been receiving.

Sometimes letters take a long time to reach me in West Australia, so this one comes to us courtesy of early August, from New Hampshire, USA:

”mortgage advice”

The response:

“Thank you for your search request. Good news! Since you had the foresight to send this in August, you’re about to get incredibly useful advice about an economic crisis before it actually happens. You can use this apparent temporal paradox to commit some rather lucrative financial shenanigans. Consult some sort of broker.

Dr and Rose Mortgage This seems relevant.

Mortgage, Photographer I heard that Mort Gages with more views are generally the best to use.

This one’s a blog post Above all else, keep your nails in top condition.

Hope that helps! For more results, send another letter containing only the word “NEXT.”

No Comments »

Jeremy: Twitter Traitor

In the 90s, people like Robert Putnam decried the dematerialization of meaningful relationships as a consequence of the move to online socialization. Today, we know that this is not true. If I were to meet Robert Putnam today, I would take him mini-golfing, so as to the have the opportunity to declare, “Nice putt, Putnam.” Then I would tell him, “You were wrong, Putnam. Online interaction doesn’t degrade the social fabric. That’s because the social fabric never really existed. Everyone was already a lying bastard trying to sell your kidney on the black market; the internet just helps us see it.”

As Exhibit A, I present to you a recent interaction in which I partook, regarding the popular Internet “microblogging” service, Twitter. Twitter lets you add / remove “followers,” and be “followed” by others accordingly. As far as I can tell, this is its primary feature. Occasionally there is also a cartoon whale on the frontpage, and from what I can tell, this is the second most important feature. Truly, the internet is a place where you can make money by giving people lists to add each other to, and showing them a whale. Perhaps we’re all cetaceaphiliacs at heart.

Needless to say, Twitter is very popular. I myself have quite a large list of followers and followees, and have spent many delightful hours observing the whale (sometimes making up stories about him — together we roam the great sea of my dreams.) Occasionally Twitter does something else, though, and this is its tertiary feature: exposing treachery, as it did in this case.

At a recent pub outing, I had a nice chat with a fellow named Jeremy (no real names.) Jeremy was another Twitter user, quite an avid one in fact, so as a matter of course we exchanged Twitter IDs. This is a pretty common exchange amongst geeks these days, and implies a certain level of established trust; to give someone your Twitter ID is to say, “I am comfortable with my ID being on a list you’ve created.”

That night, I went home, and happily tipsy on a few pints, I logged into Twitter and made myself a “follower” of Jeremy. All good, I thought. Society is ticking along grandly. We’re all friends, and by next year there probably won’t even be anymore wars anymore. Didn’t someone just make a website where you can click a link to donate a dollar to not having anymore wars anymore? There you go, problem solved.

The following morning I woke up, and booted up my Macbook. I have an application installed, Twitterizer, that starts up on launch and alerts me about changes to my Twitter status. As a rule, I check Twitterizer religiously. It displays two numbers: the number of people I’m following, and the number of people following me. I have dual monitor setup, so each number is displayed on a separate screen, in 1000 pt Verdana.

On a great day, the difference between my number of followers vs. followees exceeds 5. On a good day, it’s around 3. On an average day, it’s one or two. On a somewhat lame day, the numbers are equal. On a truly miserable day, the difference is negative. On this day, it was negative one. The reason was clear: I had “followed” Jeremy, but he had not “followed” me back.

“You bastard,” I growled under my breath. Suddenly, I was sick to my stomach. I left my bowl of Frosties unfinished.

That day at worked, I checked Twitter compulsively. Surely, I thought, he simply had not yet had the chance to follow me. He would do it any moment now, like the reasonably civil human being that he surely is. Surely he won’t risk a breakdown in social mores. It would be anarchy. Babies having babies, et cetera. At 2PM, I started to hyperventilate. At 3PM, I was a cool brick of composure, an icy ocean frozen to the seabed. Jeremy, I realized, was filth.

But the most agonizing part — the truly unabashed slap in the face of all that is good and decent — would not come until that evening.

For that evening was the evening of the monthly meeting of the Perth Twitter Zeppelin Army, a group of Twitter enthusiasts and the occasional marine biologist. Walking onto the patio, I saw all the usuals — and then I saw Jeremy. He was at the opposite end of the row of assembled tables, speaking to someone. For a moment, as I entered, he looked up at me, and our eyes locked: but instead of the frozen eternity of fiery turmoil I expected, I saw only pleasantness in his gaze. Flummoxed, I sat down. What could it mean?

Surely — surely he added me before coming here, I thought. I pulled out my iPhone, and opened Twitterizer for iPhone. Instead of the two numbers that I expected to see, I saw only the whale. But where once the whale’s mien was mirthful, he now wore a malicious grin. By a deft trick of artistry, he seemed to flipping me the bird with his fin. Atop him a speech bubble read, “YOU DISGUST ME.”

My friend Adam, who had been peering over at the screen, looked up at me. “It’s a new feature,” he informed me helpfully.

Incredibly, I raised my eyes to see Jeremy sitting down before me. He was carrying a jug of beer and a few glasses. As he started to pour, he spoke in that jocular manner to which Australians are so well accustomed, “How’s it going? Dave, right?”

He put down a filled glass before me. Incredulous, I simply stared at him. My blood seemed to drain away. But then it refilled, brimming with vitriol and some kind of extremely hot pepper sauce that’s quite nice if you use just a bit of it.

I stood. I picked up the glass, and in a motion so flawless and graceful I seemed to have been created by God specifically for this moment, I threw the beer into his face, and I shouted,

“YOU SON OF A BITCH, YOU’VE RUINED MY ENTIRE GODDAMNED LIFE.”

There are those would say I went too far. But those people do not understand Twitter.

7 Comments »

Impossible Eats

On a hypothetical top-secret blog that I can’t even tell myself about, Kate mused about a restaurant that specializes in competitive eating: the sort of eating where, if you eat the whole thing, the thing that you are eating is free. Such a restaurant does not actually exist, except for the one I just created. In my mind. However, the menu is real.

The Overbearing Mother - $29
While you consume 1 kilogram of succulent triple-A American beef, a middle-aged Protestant woman wearing fur laments your inability to land a husband due to your excess “baggage.” Optional sides: Baked potato, garden salad, baseball bat.

A Tasty Surprise - $45
Fugu is a Japanese delicacy prepared from the meat of the pufferfish. It is lethally poisonous if prepared incorrectly, and many chefs undergo years of rigorous training before they are considered able to perform this delicate task. We do not have one of these chefs. Patrons who successfully finish this dish will, in addition to the free meal, be treated to complimentary emergency medical care.

Innocence - $39
Enjoy our award-winning honey-glazed rack of lamb atop a bed of fresh herbs and scalloped potatoes. Meanwhile, a video dramatization of the lamb’s life plays out on a nearby plasma screen. Witness the key moments of the lamb’s life, from its miracle birth aboard the boat to America, to its heartwrenching battle with poverty on the streets of New York, and finally to its uplifting journey to self-betterment through its love of creative writing. Will the little lamb find the calm life of warmth and love it seeks? Answer: No, as revealed in the shocking final abattoir scene.

Taste Oddity - $79
In 1947, the US military recovered the wreckage of alien spacecraft in New Mexico, along with the remains of its pilot. We serve up five thin slivers of the alien’s brain, which have chemical properties that defy the known laws of physics. A delicious balsamic reduction and imported chevre complete the experience. The effects of consuming this material have been found to be somewhat diverse. Will you gain psychic powers, be transported to farthest reaches of the universe, or merely have sexual complications? Conditions apply: For the meal to be free, the patron must reasonably resemble a human in the vicinity of the restaurant upon completion.

The Most Dangerous Meal - $125
You: an adventurous restaurant goer. Your meal: The very same. Armed only with a fork and steak knife, you will eat or be eaten. This is competitive eating at its finest!

4 Comments »